Tag: Christian Mysticism

  • Sleep Token – Euclid: The Perfect Worship Song

    Photo by Josh Sorenson on Pexels.com

    There’s this moment.

    If you’ve ever been in a worship service—like, really been in it—you know the one.

    It’s not the opening song, where people are still settling in, still checking their phones, still thinking about where they’ll eat after. It’s not the big anthem in the middle, the one designed to stir things up, to get people moving and responding.

    No, the moment comes later. Near the end.

    It’s the one where the room feels different. Where the lights are low, and everyone is connected by something more. Where the music swells, not because it has to, but because it can’t do anything but split open the sky.

    It’s the moment where the weight of everything—the doubt, the longing, the unspeakable ache—finds its way into the melody. The guitars shimmer, the drums carry like distant thunder, and the chorus, once whispered, is now belted from the deepest part of the chest.

    And then, just like that, it’s gone.

    That moment?

    That’s Euclid.

    This isn’t just a song. It’s a Benediction.

    Sleep Token has returned with Even in Arcadia, an album that feels like it emerged from the wreckage of a collapsed cathedral, still echoing with unanswered prayers. It opens with the haunting question: “Will you halt this eclipse in me?” That’s not just poetic. That’s liturgical. That’s a soul asking for the sun to rise again inside their own chest. And while the album offers no easy resolution, it does what all sacred art does—it leads us deeper into the ache, and maybe, gently, toward the light.

    And in the context of this new release, Euclid doesn’t just feel like a final track from the previous arc. It feels like an intercession whispered across time. A response to the eclipse.

    Vessel from Sleep Token

    For those unfamiliar with Sleep Token, Euclid is the final track on their previous release Take Me Back to Eden, the last of a three-album arc that has unfolded like some kind of a modern mythos.

    It’s a story of devotion, obsession, of something (or someone) greater-than beckoning from beyond. A love that might not be love. A god that might not be god. A voice that calls and calls until you can no longer tell if it’s leading you home or leading you into the abyss.

    And here, at the end of it all, we get Euclid.

    Not with a bang. Not with fury or vengeance or some grand declaration. But with a soft, fragile acceptance and surrender.

    Like the best worship songs.

    Like the best endings.

    The Worship Song Structure™, Perfected.

    Worship music lives and dies on its ability to create space. Space to feel. Space to ache. Space to let go.

    And Euclid? It builds that space like a sanctuary. Listen along if you want as I break it down.

    • The Opening: A Whispered Prayer
      Soft keys. A voice, hushed, almost afraid to enter the room.
      It’s the vulnerable invocation. The invitation.
      Come and see.
    • The Build: Anticipation & Devotion
      The instrumentation layers build slowly, reverently, like walking into something sacred. Each verse adds weight, each chorus expands, the vocoder gives musical space for tension, the pulse quickens… kinda like a heartbeat in a quiet room. The drums are in complete control of the energy building here.
      And then, everything shifts.
    • The Release: The Spirit Moves
      The final chorus erupts, the guitars crashing like waves, the drums relentless. Voices layered upon voices. A song that was once a whisper is now a flood.
      It’s the “Oceans” moment.
      The “With Everything” moment.
      The moment in every worship set where arms lift, eyes close, and the room isn’t just a room anymore.
      It’s so much bigger than that now.
    • The Benediction: Letting Go
      And then?
      The fade. The sigh. The last note rings out, soft as breath.
      No resolution. No closure. Leaving something stirring within your soul which is now ripe for transformation.
      Like the best worship songs.
      Like the best prayers.

    Why It Works (And Why Worship Leaders Should Take Notes)

    There’s a reason modern worship music thrives on these dynamics. It’s not just about lyrics, or theology, or even belief. It’s about energy. Tension. Release. Surrender.

    The best worship songs aren’t just sung or performed.

    They’re entered into. They’re experienced.

    And Euclid is nothing if not a complete experience.

    It starts in a place of intimacy. Moves through longing. Climbs toward something unspeakably powerful. And then, in one final breathtaking surge, it arrives like a flood—not at certainty, not at resolution, but at the only thing that ever truly remains:

    Love.

    Not the easy kind. Not the simple Hallmark all-smiles kind.

    But the real kind. The aching kind. The kind that knows loss, and still chooses to give. The kind that breaks, and still finds a way to hold on.

    So maybe Sleep Token didn’t write Euclid as a “worship” song.

    Maybe they did.

    But either way, if you’ve ever stood in a room filled with voices that were bigger than those in the room, if you’ve ever let a melody carry you beyond yourself, if you’ve ever felt something break and build and become—

    Then you know.

    This song belongs there.


    A Quick Word on Sleep Token

    For the uninitiated, Sleep Token is more than just a band—it’s a ritual. An anonymous collective led by the enigmatic Vessel, they blend genres and spiritual archetypes with reckless grace, weaving metal, R&B, ambient, and pop into something altogether sacred. Their live shows are called “Rituals.” Their lyrics read like confessions. And their music often feels less like performance and more like invocation.

    To those of us exploring the Way of the Source—a path rooted in oneness, mysticism, and sacred resonance—Sleep Token doesn’t just entertain. They echo. Their work hums with that same divine ache: the desire to be known, to be transformed, to belong to something greater.

    It’s not doctrine. It’s devotion. And in a world drowning in noise and algorithms, that matters.

    Let those with ears to hear, listen.

    If this stirred something in you, make sure to subscribe and join the conversation—I’m building a community of seekers, skeptics, and mystics who see beyond the surface and hear the sacred in unexpected places.

    Also, keep an eye out for my upcoming field guide: How Not to Lose Your Family While Losing Your Religion. It’s a resource for navigating the beautiful, brutal path of deconstruction without burning every bridge along the way.

    🖤JD

  • Does God Need Blood?

    Yesterday was Good Friday and that has me thinking a lot about Jesus, his life, his movement, his death, and his resurrection. And I think it’s important that we talk about this, because how we present “God” to humanity is important. And that starts with our understanding.

    For centuries, Christians have wrestled with a haunting question: Why did Jesus have to die?
    The answers, depending on who you ask, can vary wildly. But one of the most dominant explanations — especially in American churches — is something called Penal Substitutionary Atonement (PSA).

    This is the idea that Jesus died in our place, taking the punishment (penal) we deserved for our sins, satisfying God’s wrath so that we could be forgiven. In short, God needed blood — Jesus’ blood — to satisfy divine justice and cool His wrath.

    It’s a theory so embedded in the modern Christian imagination that many assume it’s the only explanation. Even further, most Christians believe that you have to believe this to even be saved or to call yourself a Christian. From Sunday sermons to Mel Gibson’s The Passion of the Christ (or as I like to call it, Beating Up Jesus: The Movie), the narrative is relentless: humanity is sinful, God is angry, and Jesus took the beating we deserved. Roll credits.

    But there’s a glaring flaw to this theory… Jesus never said that. What if that’s not the story that Jesus came to tell?

    Let’s peel this back and start at the beginning.


    Photo by Alem Sánchez on Pexels.com

    What is Atonement Theory, Anyway?

    The word atonement literally means “at-one-ment” — the process of reconciling humanity back to right relationship with God.
    The earliest followers of Jesus, trying to make sense of his death and resurrection, developed different explanations for how this reconciliation might work.

    Here’s a quick breakdown of the most common theories:

    • Ransom Theory — Jesus pays a ransom to free humanity from Satan’s grip. Big in the early church.
    • Christus Victor — Jesus defeats the powers of sin, death, and evil.
    • Moral Influence Theory — Jesus’ life and death inspire radical love and compassion.
    • Penal Substitutionary Atonement (PSA) — Jesus takes our punishment, satisfying God’s supposed need for justice.

    PSA, which is what I’ll call it for the rest of this post, didn’t actually become mainstream until the Reformation (thanks, John Calvin), but today it’s everywhere — especially in American evangelicalism. It’s preached so often and so passionately that questioning it can feel like questioning the Gospel itself.

    But maybe the problem isn’t the questioning.
    Maybe the problem is how we’ve been taught to see God in the first place.


    The Problem with PSA: God or a Bloodthirsty Warlord?

    Let’s just be blunt: PSA turns God into a cosmic child abuser — a Father so bound by legalism that He has no choice but to kill His Son to forgive the rest of His creation.

    Imagine telling a hurting, broken person that God loves them unconditionally… but also required someone to die a brutal death to make that love possible.

    It’s no wonder so many walk away from church when they realize how twisted this sounds. Especially when they realize that the type of “unconditional love” that this belief comes with… seems to have lots of conditions, rules, and expectations.

    If God is truly love — the kind of love Jesus taught us to embody — then He shouldn’t require violence to offer forgiveness.
    We are the ones who demand violence.
    Empires demand violence.
    Religions demand sacrifices.
    God doesn’t.

    The crucifixion wasn’t about satisfying God’s wrath.
    It was the inevitable outcome of what happens when you confront the violent systems of the world with radical love and truth that renders external power systems as useless.


    Who Killed Jesus? (It Wasn’t God)

    Look closely at the Gospels, and you’ll see: Jesus wasn’t executed by God’s hand.
    He was crucified by Rome, at the urging of religious leaders.
    Empire and religion, working together, do what they always do to threats: they eliminate them.

    They silence them.
    They crucify them.
    They declare them dangerous, and they snuff them out.

    Jesus didn’t die to appease God — he died because he exposed the corruption of both empire and religious establishment.

    His life was a living protest against systems built on power, exclusion, and violence.

    • He ate with “sinners” and “outcasts”.
    • He healed on the Sabbath.
    • He forgave without a sacrifice.
    • He called out the religious elite as “whitewashed tombs.”

    They didn’t kill him because he was too holy.
    They killed him because he was too loving, too dangerous, too uncontrollable.


    Photo by Arthur Karapetyan on Pexels.com

    The Symbolism of the Cross: A Bigger Story

    If Jesus’ death wasn’t about paying off God, then what was it about?

    Through a mystical lens, the cross is layered with meaning:

    • It’s a mirror. It shows us what we do to truth, to love, to the divine when it doesn’t fit the systems and constructs that we’ve created.
    • It’s an unveiling. It exposes the violence and corruption baked into both empire and religion. The need to be right and superior, rather than repentant and transformative.
    • It’s a victory. Not the victory of punishment fulfilled, but of death and violence defeated — precisely because love resurrects.
    • And it’s an invitation. To leave behind systems of fear and step into love and alignment.

    Jesus didn’t die to uphold the sacrificial system of death and lack.
    He died to end it and bring life and abundance.

    In Matthew 5:17, Jesus says he came not to abolish the Law, but to fulfill it. And how did he fulfill it? By embodying what the Law was always pointing toward: mercy, justice, love, faith. He became the final sacrifice — not because God needed blood, but because we needed to see, once and for all, that sacrifices were never the point.

    The divine doesn’t trade in blood debts.

    The divine trades in grace, mercy, blessings, and mystery.


    So… Does God Need Blood?

    No.

    God doesn’t need blood — we do.
    We were the ones who believed sacrifices made us clean.
    We were the ones who demanded violence and death to balance the scales.

    The cross is Jesus stepping into our broken system and letting it do its worst, only to rise again and prove that love is stronger than hate, forgiveness stronger than vengeance, and life stronger than death.

    The cross wasn’t about satisfying divine wrath from a sense of lack or separation.
    It was about unmasking human wrath and showing us a better way through faith, abundance, alignment, and generosity.

    Jesus’ LIFE … his radical compassion, his healing, his forgiveness… was the point all along.
    The resurrection isn’t proof that God accepted the payment.
    It’s proof that the powers of this world don’t get the final say.

    That there is a better Way that’s been unfolding straight from the Source.

    And it’s inviting us, leading us all somewhere greater in the here and now.

    So let’s stop worshiping a bloodthirsty warlord and start following the revolutionary, resurrected Jesus — the one who taught us that God’s love doesn’t come at the end of a whip or a nail… but at the table for the least of these, with bread, wine, and an invitation to love like he did.

    Because that’s the Gospel.

    And that’s enough.

    You are enough.

    A Child of God.


    What does this stir in you? Let’s wrestle with it together in the comments.


  • The Cross Was Never “Plan A”

    Photo by Luis Quintero on Pexels.com

    At my church growing up, Easter was an event.

    Not just Sunday morning services. I’m talking full-scale theatrical production, like small-town Broadway with a crucifixion. We called it an Easter play, but really, it was a full-blown Passion drama — complete with billboards along the highway featuring my sister on Jesus’ lap, men in the congregation growing out their beards for historical accuracy, and a backstage makeup crew armed with fake blood and latex scars like a low-budget horror film masquerading as salvation.

    My actual sister talking to Jesus, aka my friend’s dad Jim, for our Easter Spectacular

    The sanctuary would transform into ancient Jerusalem. Lights dimmed. Smoke machines puffed out an eerie haze. Roman soldiers stomped around in homemade armor. I can still hear the clank of their plastic spears on dowels against the grey-carpeted plywood stage. And then there was Jesus — usually played by the same middle-aged volunteer every year, my friend’s dad Jim, who somehow managed to look both exhausted and radiant under the spotlight as they lashed him and led him to the cross he had just carried through the audience.

    Musical numbers were woven throughout, of course. These weren’t your tame, soft-rock worship hits. (Although we definitely included Avalon’s timeless CCM banger, “Testify To Love”) These were operatic, full-throated ballads about blood, sacrifice, and salvation. High drama. Choir robes swaying. And every spring, as the trees outside the church began to bud and bloom, those songs would crawl back into my head like ghosts of Easter past.

    We didn’t just perform it once, either. No, we ran it for a full weekend, sometimes longer. And after the play wrapped, we’d leave the cross standing at the front of the church like a trophy. For weeks afterward, during regular services, it loomed there — scarred, splintered, stained — casting its shadow over every sermon, every song.

    I remember sitting there as a kid, sandwiched between my friends, half-distracted by thoughts of holding hands with one of the girls in the youth group, sneaking glances during altar calls. Hormones and holy fear mixed together in a strange cocktail of confusion.

    But beneath my adolescent daydreams, another thought kept gnawing at me.

    Why did it have to be this way?

    Even as a kid, part of me wondered why the story was written in blood. Why the whole spectacle — the torment, the torture, the grotesque display of violence — was presented as good news. Why God, who supposedly loved us beyond comprehension, needed so much suffering to be satisfied.

    I didn’t have the words for it then. I just knew something felt off.

    Now, all these years later, I’ve started to understand what that feeling was.

    It wasn’t doubt.

    It was an invitation.

    That invitation would take years to answer. But eventually, it led me to question everything I thought I knew about the cross.

    Photo by Patricia McCarty on Pexels.com

    I grew up believing the cross was God’s “Plan A”.

    That from the dawn of time, God had been building toward this gruesome, brutal solution to the problem of human sin. That our rebellion was so total, so cosmic, that the only way for God to stomach our existence was to watch His own Son be tortured to death like a common criminal.

    They told me this was love.

    But I remember staring at the blood-stained cross in the sanctuary, week after week, and feeling something under my ribs tighten. Not reverence. Not relief.

    Grief.

    Confusion.

    A quiet, trembling sense that something here didn’t fully add up.

    Because if God is love… real love, unconditional love, not transaction-in-disguise love… then why the need to demand blood at all? Why set up a system of cosmic justice that could only be balanced by violence? Why build a universe that requires innocent suffering to fix what fear and separation broke?

    The deeper I went, the harder it became to reconcile the claim that Jesus’ death was necessary with the belief that God is, at essence, goodness itself. Not just good “to us,” but good at His very core level of being.

    And it turns out, the language had been whispering to me the whole time. I just didn’t know how to listen.


    Photo by Karol Wiu015bniewski on Pexels.com

    See, we inherited a story shaped not just by scripture, but by centuries of empire. Empire loves blood sacrifice — because empire lives by the sword and dies by the sword. Empire loves a violent god, because it justifies its own violence.

    But buried beneath the empire’s version of the gospel is an older song.

    Take atonement, for example. We were taught it meant appeasing God’s wrath. But the English word comes from “at-one-ment.” Union. Restoration of relationship.

    Or repentance. The Greek is metanoia — not groveling, but a change of mind. A widening of perception. A turning toward the light.

    And in Hebrew, there’s teshuvah — not a groveling apology, but a return. A homecoming. It literally means “to turn back,” not toward punishment, but toward the Source of life itself. Teshuvah is the art of remembering where we belong, of finding our way back to wholeness when we’ve lost the path. (I wrote about it at length in this blog post a few weeks ago.)

    Even sin. The Greek hamartia means “to miss the mark.” Not a legal violation deserving execution or bloodshed, but a distortion of aim. A sickness needing healing, not punishment.

    And sacrifice? Long before it became code for slaughter, the Latin roots point to “to make sacred.”

    To make sacred.

    What if Jesus didn’t die to satisfy God’s demand for violence, but to make sacred even the ugliest parts of our human story? To enter into the belly of the beast — into the empire’s machine of war, death, and brutality — and expose it for what it really is?

    A sham.

    A system built on fear, fed by scapegoats, perpetuated by people too terrified to imagine another way.


    The cross was never Plan A.

    Plan A was — and always has been — union.

    Plan A was the Garden. Walking together in the cool of the day. No separation, no shame, no sacrifice needed.

    Plan A was breath. Spirit. Ruach. The animating presence of God in all things.

    But we lost our way. Not because God demanded blood, but because we did. We built religions of fear and altars of violence, believing that blood would keep the gods at bay.

    And Jesus — Yeshua — stepped into our madness not to affirm it, but to dismantle it from the inside.

    To let it exhaust itself on his body.

    And then, to rise from the grave, holding out his wounds not as receipts of divine satisfaction, but as evidence of our deliverance from the system we thought would save us.

    The cross is not a transaction.

    It’s a revelation.

    A revelation of what happens when divine love collides with human fear.

    And a revelation that, in the end, love always has the last word.


    I’ll be unpacking this more in my next post: Does God Need Blood?

    But for tonight, let this question linger:

    What if the cross was never Plan A?

    What if God’s original plan was never punishment, but participation?
    Never condemnation, but communion?

    And what if the resurrection is not God’s bailout of a broken system, but the unveiling of a love, miraculous and powerful, that has been beneath it all, waiting to be discovered?

    We’ll go there.

    Soon.

    Stay tuned.


    Thanks for taking the time to read my blogs! I’d love it if you subscribed or left a comment, especially if something resonates with you or if your church had an easter play and I brought up some memories! -JD

  • John the Baptist

    The Wild Prophet

    Photo by Tobias Bjørkli on Pexels.com

    When we think about John the Baptist, we tend to picture a ragged, half-crazed desert preacher — camel hair for clothes, wild honey in his beard, shouting about repentance while dunking people in the Jordan River. A supporting character at the beginning of Jesus’ story. The opening act before the main event.

    In my opinion, we’ve sanded down his rough edges a little too much.

    John the Baptizer wasn’t just a quirky preacher paving the way for Jesus. He was a societal disruptor. A revolutionary. A wilderness prophet who stood outside the system not just geographically, but theologically. He wasn’t just announcing Jesus; he was embodying a radical shift — one we still wrestle with today.

    Let’s take a deeper look at the man Jesus called “the greatest among those born of women” (Matthew 11:11).


    Photo by Ron Lach on Pexels.com

    The Wilderness Prophet

    John didn’t preach in the temple. He preached in the wilderness. That alone should be setting off all the lights on your dashboard. Something more is going on here just beneath the surface.

    In Jewish thought, the wilderness wasn’t just a location. It was a symbol. Chaos. Testing. Transformation. Israel wandered there for forty years. Prophets met God there. Jesus would be tested there.

    And John? He didn’t just visit the wilderness. He became it.

    • He wore camel’s hair and a leather belt — the uniform of Elijah (2 Kings 1:8), signaling that he wasn’t just another preacher but a prophet in the old tradition, standing in defiance against the powerful and idolatrous.
    • He ate locusts and wild honey — food of the poor, the unclean, the untamed.
    • He rejected the privilege and status of his priestly lineage (his father, Zechariah, was a temple priest) and instead lived on the fringes of society.

    He wasn’t a prophet within the system. He was a prophet who was raging against the system.


    Repentance: More Than Feeling Bad

    John’s central message boiled down to one word: “Repent!”

    But the Greek word used — metanoia — doesn’t mean “feel bad for your sins.” It literally means “change your mind,” or more deeply, “go beyond your current way of thinking.”

    John wasn’t calling people to wallow in guilt. He was calling them to wake up. To see differently. To think differently. To change their mind.

    Repentance wasn’t about religious rule-following. It was about freedom — stepping out of old patterns, old assumptions, old ways of being, and into something new. It was about loosening the grip of fear, power, and control so people could be in a state to recognize the Kingdom that Jesus was bringing.

    My friends in Convictions actually released a song all about this type of spiritual shift aptly titled “Metanoia” and if you’re in to Metalcore you should check it out!


    “Underwater Swimming” by Tim Marshall/ CC0 1.0

    Baptism: A Radical Act of Rebirth

    Baptism wasn’t new. Ritual washing was already a part of Jewish tradition. But as with most things in the scriptures: John did something different. Something new.

    In the temple, ritual washing was about purity — preparing to enter God’s presence. It was something you did repeatedly, cleansing yourself over and over.

    John took it out of the temple and into the Jordan River. And suddenly, it wasn’t about ritual purity anymore.

    It was about death and rebirth.

    Going under the water was a symbolic burial of the old self. Rising up was a step into new life. A life not defined by Rome, not controlled by the temple, not shackled by fear.

    It wasn’t about being clean. It was about being free.


    The Baptist and the Lamb

    Then one day, Jesus showed up at the river.

    John saw him and said, “Behold, the Lamb of God, who takes away the sin of the world!” (John 1:29)

    It’s easy to miss how shocking that was. The crowd would have expected a Messiah described as a lion — a warrior-king, a liberator.

    But John calls him a lamb — a symbol not of power, but of sacrifice.

    John saw what others missed. Jesus wasn’t coming to conquer through violence. He was coming to conquer through self-giving love. Flipping the whole thing upside down.


    What John Means for Us

    John’s life wasn’t comfortable. It wasn’t safe. It ended in a prison cell, with his head on a platter.

    But his radical message still echoes:

    • Go to the wilderness. Sometimes you have to leave the familiar — the systems, the beliefs, the comforts, the noise — and go out into unadulterated creation to hear God clearly.
    • Repent. Not by beating yourself up, but by letting go of the old familiar ways that no longer serve truth or love.
    • Step into the water. Leave behind what’s false. Rise into what’s real.
    • Point to the Lamb. Even when people expect a lion or a king. Even when they want power and control, point to self-giving love instead.

    John reminds us that sometimes, the way to prepare for new life is to step outside of the old one — even when it’s messy, uncomfortable, or lonely.

    Because the wilderness isn’t where life ends.

    It’s where new life begins.

  • Literal or Literate?: How Your Understanding of the Bible Can Awaken Your Faith

    Most of my life, I read the Bible the way I was taught: like an instruction manual, each verse standing alone, perfectly clear in its meaning without any errors. If it said the world was made in six days, then six literal 24-hour days it was. If Jesus said, pluck out your eye if it causes you to sin, well, thank God no one took that literally… but we understood most of it that way—at face value. As if the text had been written last week, by God himself, in plain English for a modern American audience.

    Turns out, that’s not how books—especially ancient books—work.

    The word bible actually means “the books”, and if you took Spanish you may already know that it is etymologically tied to the word library. Most Protestant and Evangelical churches teach the Bible as a monolithic univocal document dropped from the sky in its final form, rather than the living, breathing, deeply human library of writings it actually is. And when we flatten it, we lose its beauty, depth, and—ironically—its truth.

    The problem, however, is not the Bible itself. The problem, my friends, is how we often read and interpret it.  The way in which we read the Bible (or our hermeneutics for short) changes everything. What happens if we read it literately instead of literally? What if we took it seriously enough to see it as it actually is—a collection of books with different genres, written by different people across centuries, in different cultural contexts, with different purposes? Suddenly, the Bible doesn’t just make more sense. It comes alive.

    What Does It Mean to Read the Bible Literately?

    To read literately means reading with an awareness of what kind of text we’re dealing with. Is it poetry? Prophecy? Myth? Parable? A first-century Jewish sermon? A legal code from a nomadic desert tribe? A deeply symbolic apocalyptic vision?

    Imagine streaming Breaking Bad like a DIY tutorial. You’d walk away thinking anyone with a Winnebago and a chemistry set can build an empire. That’s how many modern Christians read the Bible—mistaking poetry for science, metaphor for history, and cultural laws for eternal commandments for all people throughout time.

    A literate approach considers the:

    • Genre – Are we reading history, poetry, wisdom literature, prophecy, a letter, or an apocalyptic vision? Each one of these requires an entirely different lens.

    • Author & Audience – Who wrote this, who were they writing to, and why? A letter from Paul to a church in 1st-century Rome isn’t a universal law for all people for all of time.

    • Original Language – Words in Hebrew and Greek often don’t translate neatly into English. Nuance gets lost. A single word, sometimes even a letter, can change everything.

    • Historical and Cultural Context – What was happening in their world when this was written? What cultural assumptions would the original readers have had? Where is the setting?

    How We’ve Gotten It Wrong

    Let’s take a look at a few well-known passages and see how a literate approach changes things:

    • Genesis 1 – The creation story here is structured poetically, with rhythmic repetition and symbolic numbers (7 days, representing perfection and completeness). It’s less a scientific blueprint and more a beautiful theological statement: God, our Source, brings order from chaos. And did you know there are actually 2 different creation stories in the book of Genesis? And if we try to read it literally, the creation stories have some pretty significant differences, including which name it calls God.

    • The Book of Job – Often misunderstood as a historical account, Job reads more like an ancient drama exploring human suffering and the nature of God. It opens with a heavenly wager between God and “the Satan” (which means ‘the accuser,’ not necessarily the devil who is never even mentioned in the Hebrew Bible) — a setup that sounds more like a stage play than a court transcript.

    • The Parables of Jesus – The Good Samaritan isn’t just a nice story about kindness. To Jesus’ audience, Samaritans were despised outsiders from another country. His point was and still is scandalous: The “enemy” is the one who is showing God’s love. A literal English reading often misses that gut-punch.

    • Revelation – Apocalyptic literature is highly symbolic. Reading Revelation like a future newspaper misses its original purpose: to offer hope to persecuted Christians under Roman rule. The Beast isn’t your least favorite politician from that other evil party — it most likely represented Emperor Nero. You know… in Rome?

    How This Can Change Your Faith (For the Better)

    If you stop reading the Bible like a list of divine tweets straight from God’s thumbs and start reading it as a collection of ancient, sacred, deeply human writings wrestling with the divine, something happens.

    1. It becomes way more interesting – No more boring, redundant rulebook. Instead, you’re diving into ancient poetry, mystical visions, political resistance literature, and letters of encouragement to underground faith communities.
    2. It opens itself to mystery – Instead of needing everything to be perfectly clear, rigid, and factual, you may start embracing subversive language, paradox, symbol, and meanings with deeply rich layers.
    3. It frees you from harmful interpretations – A literal reading has been used to justify war, slavery, misogyny, homophobia, and genocide. A literate reading recognizes when a text is describing something, not prescribing it.
    4. It deepens your connection to the Divine – Rather than a static set of rules and doctrines, you encounter a dynamic conversation with God, one that invites you, like its characters, to wrestle, question, doubt, misunderstand, and grow.

    Jesus Read the Scriptures This Way… So We Should Too.

    Jesus himself did not read Scripture literally. He was so intimately aware of the spirit within the words that he reinterpreted, reframed, and challenged the common readings of his time. “You have heard it said… but I tell you…” was his way of saying, Hey, you’ve been reading this wrong. Let me show you what it actually means. Let me show you how deep the rabbit hole goes.

    When we move from literalism to literacy, we’re by no means abandoning Scripture—we’re respecting it. We’re engaging with it the way it was meant to be engaged: as an unfolding revelation, a window into the divine, a story that pulls us deeper into love, justice, peace, and transformation.

    I think that’s part of what Jesus meant when he said, “The truth will set you free.“

    And maybe, just maybe, it starts by learning how to read.

    Resources

    If you’re curious about diving deeper, here are some authors and books that have been helpful to me:

    • Inspired by Rachel Held Evans

    • The Bible Tells Me So by Peter Enns

    • What Is the Bible? by Rob Bell

    • Surprised by Hope by N.T. Wright

    • Jesus Through Middle Eastern Eyes by Kenneth E. Bailey

    • The Universal Christ by Richard Rohr

    Also check out the fascinating public scholar work of Dan McClellan.  He’s about to release his first book since he took his work public called “The Bible Says So: What We Get Right (and Wrong) About Scripture’s Most Controversial Issues” on April 29th.  In the meantime check him out on TikTok, Instagram, and Youtube. I also have a resources tab here, but I haven’t had the time to really put much together over there yet while I focus on writing and getting this blogging thing started.

    Happy reading.

    And happy un-reading, too.